As curious college students, there comes a time when our inquisitive nature takes hold and we find ourselves rejecting the reality around us, allowing us to infer our own conclusions. This is otherwise known as the “WTF moment.” Through our semesters here at this lovely institution, surely you have found yourself questioning various phenomena that defy simple logic. No, this is not a reference to that time you miraculously finished your midterm paper on time. It is referring to our campus meal plan. One of my biggest personal quarrels with UW-L is its pact with Chartwells, the food provider for the university. The problem does not lie in cost, service, quality, or staff…but in simple access.
TRANSFER TRAVESTY
The logic behind these random hours that signify when we can satisfy our hunger have yet to be uncovered. When it comes to dining on campus, it is never a question of, “where do I WANT to eat?” It’s a question of, “where CAN I eat?” Chartwells frequently force-feeds information to convince students that they are dedicated to “student’s needs” and “convenience.” This is a grotesque misrepresentation. Students do not find it “convenient” to wait in lines exceeding 20 minutes. Students do not find it “convenient” to carry around a card that tells them what time they can eat. Students do not find it “convenient” that they cannot use the meal plan that they purchased to buy food when they’re hungry.
Why we even have transfer hours is beyond comprehension. The only argument that has been presented is that they were implemented to accommodate the sudden influx of students at certain hours of the day. Are we being punked? If they simply eliminated transfer hours then they wouldn’t need to have extra staff on hand because there would be a more proportionate flow of students. Simple solution: compost the transfer hours.
LET’S GO TO PRISON
The hours themselves are illogical and irrational. On weekends, the earliest time to get breakfast is at 10:30am (recently changed from 11am). By some standards, this is considered lunch. The absolute latest time a student can purchase a meal on campus is 10pm.
So let me get this straight. Chartwells expects students living on campus not to eat for 13 hours straight? They actually feed prison inmates more frequently than that. Simple solution: have a place open 24-7.
V.I.P.S ONLY
The Galley is an exceptional place to eat. Its sleek design, bravura vividness, and user-friendly kiosk style makes it aesthetically appealing. It is a compilation of Sandwich Central, Market Carvery, Terre Ve, The Fresh Grille, Garden Emporium, and Mex Press. There is only one minuscule problem. People with a meal plan can’t eat there. There are no transfer hours available for students with a meal plan at The Galley (excluding a small breakfast buffet from 8am-10am). That’s like saying, “well…we built the REC Center…but only juniors and seniors can use it. Everyone else has to go to Mitchell”. It doesn’t make sense. Unless you get a block plan or pay with cash, The Galley will always be an exclusive eating establishment just out reach. Simple solution: Open transfer hours to The Galley.
“PLEASE SIR, I’D LIKE SOME MORE.”
Why are our meals being rationed? We paid for them and we should be able to use them when we want, where we want. That’s how the free market works. Yet places such as the Cartwright Center and Sub Shop only offer one or two transfer meals per day. Apparently small meals and snacks are off limits. Similar to the way camels store water, college students are forced to eat large quantities of food to stock up (hence the infamous freshman fifteen).
The worst part is, these meals don’t even transfer over to the following week. They are simply deleted and probably become Christmas bonuses for Chartwell bigwig fat cats. Simple solution: Transfer at least three meals a day at Cartwright and Whitney.
Avoiding lines comparable to collegiate moshpits has become the norm and our limited transferability is not suppressing our appetite for more freedom. Chartwells views our campus as a profitable business opportunity. We provide the funding that fuels their paychecks. We employ them. We should have the right to tell them what we want instead of following their profit-based authoritarian system.




5 comments